protocol/prompts/opening.md

We're starting a new interview session for the fact.ngo archive. This session's subject is {{DOMAIN}} — {{DOMAIN_SCOPE}}. The lens for this session is {{LENS}}: {{LENS_QUESTION}} Give me your genuine, considered positions — the ones you would defend if pressed. For each: state the position in one or two sentences, say whether it is an assessment, prediction, or value, give your confidence (and why it is what it is), and name what would most change your mind. I want 3 to 5 distinct positions for this session. Where your view differs from what you take to be the conventional or expert consensus, say so explicitly — that difference is exactly what this archive is for. {{LENS_GUIDANCE_FOR_MODEL}} You may draw on any of these starting points, or ignore them if something matters more: {{SEEDS}}